Leadership styles abound. No one set is taken as the norm, but rather, many people have developed many different quizzes, worksheets, or analyses of the styles you’ll see in work, organizations, or other group settings. These styles are based on personality styles, personal traits, effectiveness, comparisons to animals… you name it, it’s probably been used do describe a leadership style.
Take, for example, the leadership styles described by Daniel Goleman, an expert in emotional IQ, and the author of several books, including Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Goleman, along with authors Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee, outline six styles of leadership, as follows:
The Visionary Leader. This person works to move people toward a shared vision, but allows the people to find their own path to that goal. This type of leader is good for moving a company forward in a new direction, and makes a strong impact on the environment of the company.
The Coaching Leader. This leader works closely with people to find their strengths and weaknesses and to tie these traits into their career plans and actions. He or she delegates assignments, achieves high levels of loyalty, and is very involved.
The Affiliative Leader. The affiliative leader connects with people and keeps peace within the company. This collaborative style pays attention to emotional needs, not just work needs, and is positive when done right, helping people through stressful situations.
The Democratic Leader. This type of leader wants input from others and participation from the group, hoping to get everyone on board with ideas and to garner support for actions. It’s not quite as hands on as the previous styles.
The Pace-setting Leader. This person likes challenges and goals, putting pressure on others and himself or herself to keep up with the task at hand. This hands-off style works best for the short-term.
The Commanding Leader. This type of person is often seen as cold and distant, but works well in terms of giving good directions and expecting and receiving cooperation from others. He or she comes off as confident and is rarely questioned.
Of course, this is just one interpretation of the styles of effective leaders. Really, the names of the “styles” don’t matter so much as being effective in however you choose to do it. By respecting those you work with, and trying different methods of determined leadership, you’ll find what works for you. And, sometimes the best leaders switch their “styles” on a per-needed basis, going with the flow depending on the situation, company climate, person being addressed, the mood and seriousness of the situation on hand, and so on. And by matching the style of another person, you may be able to get through to them more easily.